Product Classification

Who Supplies Non-medical Evidence for a Device–Cosmetic Combination?

Assign facts to the party that can confirm them instead of shifting all evidence to the other supplier.

Assign facts to the party that can confirm them instead of shifting all evidence to the other supplier. The Chinese search terms “non-medical certification” and “non-medical notice” should be understood through medical-device classification and the exact wording of the relevant document. They do not describe a general product-safety certification. This article concerns evidence preparation and business decisions; it does not establish that any particular device has received a decision not to be regulated as a medical device. The device company explains output and steps; the cosmetic supplier explains substance and conditions. One brochure does not cover the combination.

Facts to establish

Reconstruct the use conditions of both device and companion substance. Identify the substance, composition records, amount, body area, steps and claimed action. A status held by the companion product does not determine the device classification, and studies of another formulation cannot be applied unconditionally.

How to move the project forward

Start verification from the intended purpose: spreading, experience, substance transfer or another action. Engineering and the substance supplier should confirm facts, then assess which statements existing evidence supports. Any additional study must match the object, conditions and final product. Do not write unfinished findings into a response.

Agree who confirms formulation, supplies documents, explains changes and authorises external citation. A supplier’s promotional wording is not a substitute for verifiable composition. Keep gaps visible in the assessment. Simply replacing “infusion” with “application” does not resolve uncertainty about the actual action or classification.

Decision boundaries

Name owners for composition records, intended-use confirmation and change notices. Review formula changes against verification conditions. Separate supplier files do not establish the combined use; describe the actual procedure delivered to the user.

For a concrete assessment, collect the model, current instructions, intended scenario and unresolved questions. Separate verified facts from assumptions before prioritising documentation, verification or actual product changes. An individual assessment does not replace a formal decision or guarantee an outcome, completion date or acceptance by every sales channel.

This article provides general compliance information and cannot replace a formal assessment of a specific product. Regulations, classification catalogues, guidance, and enforcement practice may change; each project should rely on the rules then in effect, the actual product, and formal documents.
Digital Project PortalCompliance Center Submit Assessment